pull down to refresh

Great idea!
What happen when a "worker" did not do well the contracted job?

Remember Hearn's Lighthouse project[1] where you could pledge UTXOs and then everyone could shame you if you spent the coin you pledged?

But it ran on BitcoinJ w/ SPV so then we suddenly needed BIP-64/getutxo.

  1. tor link in case anyone else has issues with wayback

reply
95 sats \ 1 reply \ @sedited 4 Jun

I always wondered why nobody followed up on it.

reply

IIRC it ultimately went with the fork, and never got real traction past the press release there either. And it was surrounded with controversy and toxicity. Perhaps the OP execution is a safer path with a higher chance of success.

reply
95 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 4 Jun

I didn't know about this. Looks like a fun rabbit hole.

reply

Lots of dead links nowadays. But it was cool.

reply

Had not heard of this. The idea of pledging a specific utxo instead of an amount of bitcoin is neat from a fee standpoint too.

reply

Thanks!

Any one of the pledgers can flag the worker for bogus work. The platform never collects the money. It just produces invoices for the worker and sends them to the pledgers. So the pledger isn’t forced to pay, but their reputation gets docked if they don’t pay or flag the job for bad work.

If it catches on, I’ll need to work out arbitration options or something like that.

reply

Shit can happen all the time.
Not that workers could have bad intentions or can be scammers.
But sometimes bad execution can be from other factors and the job must have some litigations when are a lot of money involved.

This is similar to https://zap-work.com/

reply

Regardless of the arbitration process, if I were the worker I would feel much safer if the backer’s contribution was already locked behind a smart contract. Could use Rootstock for that, I guess.

reply