pull down to refresh
Ahh, but were you using exactly the right kind of standard errors?
reply
I did in fact have to redo my standard errors using bootstrapping for one of the revisions
reply
I remember one of my grad school officemates getting super bogged down in different standard errors.
He was doing something that didn't neatly match any convention and there were about half a dozen plausibly correct methods to choose from, so he ended up spending weeks on making these big ugly tables comparing his results with each of the methods.
reply
I feel this in my bones.
I just went through a 2 year publication cycle between first submission and final acceptance. 4 rounds or revision. The main results and central insights did not change the entire time.