That would be interesting, or even allowing the choice of who covers the payment—whether it's split or absorbed by the node that isn't closing. In a scenario where a node connects other small local merchants with outside nodes, you could let that large node absorb the channel closing costs as a benefit. Are there any proposals today for something like what you suggested?
That would be interesting, or even allowing the choice of who covers the payment—whether it's split or absorbed by the node that isn't closing. In a scenario where a node connects other small local merchants with outside nodes, you could let that large node absorb the channel closing costs as a benefit. Are there any proposals today for something like what you suggested?