pull down to refresh

32 sats \ 1 reply \ @k00b 4 Apr \ parent \ on: LLM coding is the wrong layer of abstraction devs

I haven't read OP but I'd guess the answer is:

  1. LLMs are nondeterministic (although it might be possible to make them deterministic)
  2. Code is already a human language (detailed) spec
  3. Inference of frontier LLMs, ones large enough that they can translate human language into programs as reliably as code can, require above average hardware
  4. LLMs aren't as hands-free as people talk about them being

write
compose
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @SimpleStacker 4 Apr

the OP itself is worth a read, it's only like two paragraphs, not even a full blog post

reply