pull down to refresh

So your claim is: take away slave-grown cotton from the core textile industry, and nothing materially changes?

yes.

What's so hard/objectionable/unacceptable about this? Slavery, as abhorrent an institution it is from our modern pow -- having been present absolutely everywhere in human history -- was economically inefficient, upheld by communal subsidies, and played an altogether minor (read: none) role in bring about the rich, modern world

reply

And it wasn’t just cotton, slaves produced tobacco, sugar, rice, indigo. If all of that disappears, what replaces those outputs in your model?

reply