pull down to refresh

PPLNS makes more sense. We're working on a PPLNS mode based on the DATUM-style non-custodial payout model

On the topic of PPLNS, you find that DATUM is better than SV2? Why?

I don't think DATUM is better than SV2. I am not fan of the fact that OCEAN or Luke itself applies transaction censorship either. Our plan is to combine both:

SV2 for the transport, encryption, and template control (JDP) — all the protocol-level benefits
DATUM-style payout construction for PPLNS — meaning payouts go directly to each miner's address in the coinbase transaction, not to a pool wallet that then distributes later

So the pool never takes custody. No "pool → miner" payout step, no withdrawal minimums, no trust. You mine, you get paid in the block itself.

It's SV2 for the protocol, DATUM-style for the payout model. Best of both, without OCEAN's censorship baggag

reply
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @anon 19 Apr

ok bro, you have my blessing to call it SV3 :D

reply