pull down to refresh

22 sats \ 5 replies \ @sox 12h

I'm starting to think that twitter wants monnnnney for the privilege to show their media on another website.

reply
191 sats \ 0 replies \ @DarthCoin 12h

yeah could be. fuck'em we will download the videos anyways.

reply

Or some measure against bots.

reply

on telegram plays nice, no problem

reply

So it might be some issue with the SN fetching method.

reply
122 sats \ 0 replies \ @sox 12h

To detect if a link is an image or a video, we used to load it on your browser and then load it again to show it to you. That was wasteful, and we now detect if a link is an image or a video with a microservice, for better reliability.

That worked! Our microservice was able to detect that the link was a video (by downloading its first bytes) and the editor indeed tried to load it.
Loading media happens client-side and in your browser, basically just <video src="https://video.twimg..." />. Probably Twitter/X reads the origin of the request (stacker.news) and rejects it with 403 (Forbidden).

I'll check this out, maybe there's more to it, and come back with results.

reply

fixed for you. Now you can't unsee it :)
I was lazy to download it... we should avoid as much is possible using twatter links.

reply

WTF! Put it back the way it was.

reply

πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚
Looks like another version of Jameson Lopp LOL

reply

~lol~lol

Poor Lopp, now he’s got lookalikes with boobs!

reply