pull down to refresh
It's an option, for sure. The question is the privacy and costs that would have over the privacy and costs of CoinJoining.
As a rule of thumb anything over 10M sats will be cheaper to CoinJoin for the same level of anonymity (and the possibility of more, and measurable).
you are comparing ln costs to on chain costs
two different worlds
Exactly. Ones are proportional to the transaction amount and the others are fixed. Those lines intersect.
you don't know what you're talking about.
just by mentioning the 0 fee channels and he demonstrate that he knows more than you...
If you use a single UTXO onchain to coinjoin, you cannot pass more sats than you have in that UTXO...
Meanwhile through a single LN channel you can coinjoin as many sats you want.
More than that, if you are smart you can make it to leave NO onchain trace..
Just think about, even if you are traced, a single UTXO of 1M sats that is in a public block, in fact it was transferring let's say 10 BTC through that single channel and nobody have any trace (except the channel peers - but that is another aspect).
Think in perspective. Mastering LN is an art of using all its properties and solutions.
yes why not? never heard about private and disposable LN nodes? Decoy nodes?
Buying a LSP channel in advance, without using any of your UTXOs... using a private disposable LN node... through that single fucking channel you can pass through infinite sats, endlessly.
These are just few examples... Are several scenarios to use.
Nobody is forcing you to run PUBLIC LN nodes. Private and disposable / decoy nodes are just fine.