pull down to refresh
I am perhaps less attuned to it than you. The very article discussed in the OP felt to me like it may have been generated, but I can't quite bring myself to believe the author was so brazen as to AI generate a piece about how AI generated pieces break a social contract.
It does list an AI thing as an "editor" so perhaps that is what I'm picking up on.
Still, I feel that I am getting a little paranoid about deciding whether something is slop or not, and often find myself wondering somewhere around the second paragraph if I haven't made a mistake one way or the other.
My solution is usually to read the thing and think through whether it conveys anything meaningful, but this comes at the cost of potentially investing time and thought into a total catfishing project.
I can't quite bring myself to believe the author was so brazen as to AI generate a piece about how AI generated pieces break a social contract.
I wish I had your faith in humanity. I deal with tricksters every day so I don't take anything at face value, ever. This is likely why, when I am spending my time reading SN, I have extremely low tolerance for it.
My solution is usually to read the thing and think through whether it conveys anything meaningful, but this comes at the cost of potentially investing time and thought into a total catfishing project.
I have to do this on code I have to review.
I didn't sign any such contract 😂
Seriously though, this asymmetry is still detectable. I mostly just write a single angry sentence when someone betrays my trust this way.