Mmm, well I'm not saying that I think the value of the content is based on how much effort put into it.

More like, it's easier than ever to spam content that on the *surface* looks like it meets the quality standard, but when you dig deeper it doesn't.  The capacity to verify what's truly good and what isn't is gonna be a major bottleneck going forward

SimpleStacker

What's funny is that it sounds like a labor theory of value for content -- the content is only worthwhile if someone spent time on it. I react strongly to this and think shouldn't the content be the measure? If it is interesting and meaningful, wouldn't I want to read it even if it was just a prompt?

Of course, perhaps what I want then is to read the prompt.

 say a number of times, that we should find someway to get the slop posters to post their prompts because those at least might be interesting.

AI Generated Content Broke the Social Contract - Alex Hillman

Scoresby

What's funny is that it sounds like a labor theory of value for content -- the content is only worthwhile if someone spent time on it. I react strongly to this and think shouldn't the content be the measure? If it is interesting and meaningful, wouldn't I want to read it even if it was just a prompt?

Of course, perhaps what I want then is to read the prompt. 

This is something I've heard @k00b say a number of times, that we should find someway to get the slop posters to post their prompts because those at least might be interesting.