No, interesting I'd love to check it out! BTW a lot of the quantum companies are eyeing the satoshi coins as you can imagine.

Have you followed @benthecarman's argument that having a large pot of bitcoin that are up for grabs (in the case where there is more than one cryptographically relevant quantum computer) could lead to a lot of chain reorganizations?

He wrote a piece about it here: https://stacker.news/items/1476783

Scoresby

TBH, I don't have a strong opinion there. I think it distracts from what I see as the bigger effort: making Bitcoin secure for people that are able to access their funds.

That said, if you forced me to answer, I'd probably advocate for EITHER something like hourglass that rate limits the quantum exploits for P2PK UTXOs, OR recycling some of them into the mining rewards at the end of the emission curve.

Like I said, I don't have a strong opinion

Alex Pruden, CEO Project Eleven AMA

apruden2008

TBH, I don't have a strong opinion there. I think it distracts from what I see as the bigger effort: making Bitcoin secure for people that are able to access their funds. 

That said, if you forced me to answer, I'd probably advocate for EITHER something like hourglass that rate limits the quantum exploits for P2PK UTXOs, OR recycling some of them into the mining rewards at the end of the emission curve. 

Like I said, I don't have a strong opinion