(Originally in WSJ, but it's paywall-free at MSN.)
Over the past year, at least 60% of active UMA voters could be directly linked to Polymarket accounts, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of Polymarket and blockchain data. In more than 300 disputes—or nearly one in five during that period—at least one UMA voter had a financial stake in the outcome of the Polymarket bet they were voting on.
Yeah, I could see how this could be a problem.
That’s wild.
My suggestion to @Team_Predyx, if they ask some of us to resolve markets for them, is to require that we sell our shares before voting on a resolution.
Thank you for the suggestion. That’s actually a very thoughtful point. We’ll seriously consider implementing something along those lines to further improve fairness and transparency in market resolutions.
Really appreciate your feedback and continued support for Predyx.
That’s very “crypto” of them.
Quiero aprender sobre cripto mones me pueden enseñar porfavor amigos estoy empezando resien