Do you feel well-informed, anon?
Shit like this terrifies me... invisible, slow-working, long-term damage:
Clean air is important for health, yet many homes are rife with pollutants. Household products such as cleaning solvents, waxes, paints and varnishes often contain volatile organic compounds like benzene and toluene, which can cause skin irritation, eye damage, neurological disorders and cancer. Furnishings and carpets, for their part, can slowly release formaldehyde, another carcinogenic molecule.
Air purifiers can help, but houseplants have in recent years been marketed as a more aesthetic alternative. Amazon, an e-commerce giant, sells plants described as being for “air purification” alongside more traditional categories such as “low-maintenance” and “pet-friendly”. But how good a job can plants actually do?
Plants GOOD...
Scientists have long known that plants can change the composition of the air around them as they breathe, turning carbon dioxide into oxygen in the process.
Whereas many plants, like pines and yews, have hairy, waxy or rough leaves that readily accumulate pollutants on their surfaces (and are often planted next to busy roads for precisely this reason), some species draw these molecules into their tissues through holes in their leaves known as stomata. Of those that draw in pollutants, some produce enzymes capable of breaking apart molecules such as benzene and formaldehyde. Research published in the EU Journal of Internal Medicine in 2017 further revealed that some plants send small amounts of the intact pollutants to their roots, where microbes in the soil devour them as food.
...BUT the kind of plants we tend to have at home (broadleaf, evergreen species, tropical/subtropical ones) aren't that
Experiments run with plants in ordinary rooms have yet to show any meaningful benefits. [...] Air flow systems that attempt to purify air by blowing it over dense layers of vertically grown vegetation (known as living walls) have shown more promise in real-world settings. Even so, the improvements to air quality are small (one study showed that 60 square centimetres of plants could reduce an office’s carbon-dioxide concentration by just under 2%) and living walls, though attractive, are not easy to maintain.
"It is a safer bet to appreciate your plants for the many other benefits they bring—and stick to an electric air purifier instead""It is a safer bet to appreciate your plants for the many other benefits they bring—and stick to an electric air purifier instead"
I guess I'll make a living wall, then??
archive: https://archive.md/dd5Kl
Riveting stuff, friend. I see the Economist is out there answering the important questions, while my paper on financial incentives in discussion platforms is considered too niche to get published at general audience journals.
totally... I've always found this segment odd in The Economist. Just really doesn't belong... and even within that... you're discussing houseplants??
I remember hearing this as a kid and in my adolescence. Then I looked into it.
The answer of course is that you should have a jungle in your house.
Sounds like a lot of fun until, one morning, you have a stare down with a giant tarantula squatting over your toothbrush.
No, Tarzan. Just go live in the jungle!
Plants don’t use up oxygen at night, do they?
no clue... how so? (Also, use up is weird... what, my house is hermetically sealed and I'll suffer from oxygen depletion...?)
If I remember right from science class, plants take in oxygen at night and CO2 during the day. I’m not sure if the amount of oxygen they use is bad for you when they're indoors. I don’t even know if that's just a myth, so I'm gonna do a quick search.
Chat’s saying it’s a myth!
cool, THANKS!
I used to rent a studio for rehearsals 2 floors down in a Shanghai bomb shelter. The air was poor so I got some devils ivy down there. Not sure how much it helped. Every few hours it felt like a good idea to go up for air.
now that's a story I wanna hear
I feel like you should intuitively guess this. Plants are now swelling up by weight or volume due to absorbed atoms.
Reduce CO2 by 2% is an irrelevant metric for talking about pollutants.