pull down to refresh

Back when Bernie Sanders was out shouting in the media -- and said things like "We should be more like SWEDEN!" -- our Cato-affiliated friend, Johan Norberg, #607347, #969787, wrote op-eds and went on television saying... YEES, America should be more like Sweden: you know, more free trade, less onerous bureaucracy, better protection of property, integrity of government etc, and all the other ways in which Sweden outperforms 'Murica in economic freedom (= every metric but size of government. Duh.)

Oh man, do I have things to say about this topic -- and this article specifically.Oh man, do I have things to say about this topic -- and this article specifically.

Stupid attention-grabbing headlines, of course, because Sweden (and Swedes) do not love capitalism... though they seem somewhat less outspokenly hostile to it, compared to some loud-mouthed idiots elsewhere...

It's a nice long read, touching on some select current-affairs topics (gang violence, private schools, inequality, economic miracle, growth challenges)... though completely overdoes the "privately operated-publicly financed" schooling and hospital.
That's NOT what's interesting about Sweden's 50-year pivot from Big(gest!) Government!

THIS history should be the focus, not political squibbles over whether some high school is too lavish with public funds

Sweden didn’t always have a big public sector. The country climbed from being one of the poorest to the third-richest country in Europe over 100 years through 1970 without high levels of taxation. But starting in the 1960s, the center-left Social Democratic Party—which dominated the country’s postwar politics—sharply raised taxes and spending, ultimately taking government spending as high as 70% of GDP by the 1990s. The changes triggered a long period of weak growth, stagnant after-tax incomes and ballooning budget deficits and debt that culminated in a banking crisis in the early ’90s.
They included cuts to unemployment benefits and housing subsidies and the privatization of public services, as well as tax cuts and a reform of the pension system to make it more affordable. Strict limits were imposed on government debt. (Sweden’s debt to GDP is a meager 36%, compared with 129% for the U.S.) In the mid-2000s, the government eliminated wealth and inheritance taxes.

That history is fantastic. 1870-1970, under comparatively _small_ government, Sweden had the (second-fastest... Japan fucked us) per-capita GDP growth ever recorded. And then Icarus flew too close to the sun, lefties thought they could do nothing wrong, and spent a few decades ruining _a lot_.

The backlash/pinball from some financial and banking crises in the ~1990s and constant deregulation/abolishing harmful taxes and lowering rates since have been a godsend.

America should take note of this storyAmerica should take note of this story

(That debt ratio, too, is, all things considered, pretty impressive.)

And, of course, any story in the 2020s need to have an AI angle... oh, look, private hospital rolling out AI use and telehealth faster! https://stacker.news/items/1492590telehealth

Like all Swedish hospitals, St. Göran’s is publicly funded. But it is owned by a private hospital operator, Capio, and its chief executive trained at McKinsey and talks about KPIs and the Toyota model of lean management. That mentality is one reason St. Göran’s rolls out productivity-enhancing tools like AI far faster than its state-run rivals. “We do more for less,” says CEO Gustaf Storm. He estimates it costs 15%-20% more at public Swedish hospitals to treat conditions such as appendicitis than at his hospital.
Stefan Fölster, an economist and former Finance Ministry official, argues that the vast majority of Swedes have benefited from the reforms. Households’ inflation-adjusted incomes have doubled on average since the 1990s, after stagnating during the 1970s and ’80s under high taxation, Fölster noted.
Underscoring the country’s new psyche, school choice is now deeply entrenched in Sweden, with broad backing among parents and within both the current center-right government and center-left opposition Social Democratic Party.
But ahead of September’s general election, fractures over for-profit schools—and societal shifts—are surfacing, and are expected to play a large role in campaigns. The Social Democrats are promising a ban on school profits. The party is also calling for higher investments in public services and social welfare and criticizing past tax cuts for the wealthy.

Yea, boring. I wish it'd be taxation, growth, the oppressive payroll taxes that squeeze out lots of work and the powerful unions squeezing out the rest, and the insane (top-rate) marginal taxes.

Anyway, interesting read if all you know about Sweden is Abba, IKEA, and socialist utopia.


https://archive.md/5j9BK

I remember watching the documentary on Swedish Socialism which I think was Jonah's. The TLDR was this.

Sweden went full socialist in the 70s. IE real socialism, not capitalism with a large welfare state which is what they are now. It didn't go well. Shocker. So they reformed and began to prosper again.

The other takeaway was that their welfare state worked better when there was a stronger tight culture and work ethic. IE, less free loaders. Over time freeloaders increased. Adversarial relationships between unions and management is getting worse. As their society becomes more diverse there is more of a sense of entitlement to benefits and more resentment from those working towards those who are taking.

It all makes sense to me. Full socialism is madness. More economic freedom leads to more abundance but with a weaker culture and more diversity it is harder for any system to work.

Because Sweden is small some social programs can work better when there is a more unified cultural ethic. These systems over time lead to entitlement and resentment. Add in foreign cultures with different moral values and norms and it starts to show cracks.

The lesson for me is that programs to help people if they are done in a small local first way by groups that have shared values are far more likely to show success. The bigger and more diverse the more likely you see abuse by the faciltators, the reciever's and the providers.

The Democratic Socialist point to Sweden as an example of socialism but it isn't a positive one. It actually seems to not only NOT be socialism but it is an example of how when tried in a great place where you'd think it would work it failed.

reply

I'd go as far as to argue that the size of government is actually secondary the morality and culture of the people.

that's not to say that government structure doesn't matter at all. even the most ethical people wouldn't succeed at full blown socialism because of the calculation problem. But on the margins of government programs that get actively debated, I'd suspect that the culture of the people matters more than the specific design of the program .

reply

If men were angels, etc.

reply

Pretty much. Socialism is trying to solve a problem it has zero ability to solve. Evil.

reply
size of government is actually secondary the morality and culture of the people

This. And honestly even just a common morality even if the morality is not perfect is better than what we have now in the US for example. Becoming more and more convinced that the left/right system arguements we have are nearly pointless when we have fewer shared morals and world view.

One of the biggest lies is that only religious people are religious. Everyone has a world view and a world view is just another word for religion. It is impossible to divorce relgiion from government. We think we have a separation but really we just created new religions and are in denial about it.

What we see in politics might just be competing religions. Obviously some systems work better than others but one of the biggest problems that almost always gets shunned as off-limits is cultural commonality. We worship diversity today and it's killing us.

reply

100% the right read. Agreed

reply
interesting read if all you know about Sweden is Abba, IKEA, and socialist utopia.

All I know about Sweden is Ikea, Lego, and Magnus Carlsen

reply

Lego is Danish and Magnus Carlsen Norwegian!!

Oh, yous pulling my leg. -_-

reply

What’s the role of the private owners in the publicly funded hospitals?

Are they just trying to stay below their budget or are there financial incentives for better services?

reply

Yes, basically. You get some funds for treatment/service, on par with the public hospitals, and if you run it better or make service more efficient etc (the AI example in the WSJ story) whatever surplus you eke out is your profit

reply
6 sats \ 0 replies \ @Solomonsatoshi 23 May -100 sats

https://m.stacker.news/142333