reply on: What follows after liberal democracy? \ ~hyperlinks

pull down to refresh

1 sat \ 4 replies \ @kepford OP 27 May \ parent \ on: What follows after liberal democracy? Politics_And_Law

That's going forward. You can't go back to the previous state. You create a new one that is influenced by the previous.

1 sat \ 3 replies \ @denlillaapan 27 May

thus, monarchy. told yah

22 sats \ 2 replies \ @kepford OP 27 May

Yeah, Monarchy's going backwards. So no, not monarchy as we know it. Notice I didn't say there won't be a ruling elite class. I suspect there will be, just as there is now. There aren't gonna be kings though. They're not gonna be that blatant about it.

75 sats \ 1 reply \ @denlillaapan 27 May

no, it's not going backwards. It's updating/correcting an error.

Also, what is this Whiggish nonsense of constant progression to some ideal? Says who?

20 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford OP 27 May

Asking the right question, progress according to who? I'm just repeating the propaganda. Progress as in progressing from where you were to where you are, not in the valuation sense.