pull down to refresh

What do you think of that?

California has direct democracy on a lot of issues. I am not sure if it's been a net good or net bad.

I can tell you, in California, it's been a net negative. It's bad enough when you have politicians with poor incentives making terrible decisions. It's even worse when you have uneducated, easily manipulated plebs making decisions that are very hard to undo. State of California is massively in debt, in large part due to the proposition system. Then there's high speed rail. Thank you, propositions.

People that can't lead their own lives in a productive and successful way should have no business selecting leaders. When we have a world that has lost its moral compass, the last thing we need is the masses making moral decisions. And that's the problem in my opinion. We have lost our moral compass. This is why I believe religious people are wasting their time when they're focusing solely on politics. They should instead be focusing on their families, on their parish and their communities.

But... that's just my opinion :)

reply

This reminds me of the John Adams quote: "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other."

More democracy won't save society if the people themselves are foolish.

reply

when Adams said it USA was not a democracy. in fact the constitution is about a republic not a democracy

reply
People that can't lead their own lives in a productive and successful way should have no business selecting leaders.

It's a slippery slope, this business of adding filters to who may or may not select. Then it all becomes a game of who controls the filters.

In any event, that is not democracy. Yet I've had countless arguments with mostly lefties but also others about that as they were seriously thinking some form of "voting license" would help democracy.

reply

I don’t know what your definition of democracy but I already hate it.

the franchise should be limited to male property owners

women should not vote because they are too emotional and irrational

felons should not vote

non citizens should not vote

The homeless should not vote

renters should definitely not vote

reply

You missed a big one. Government employees should not be allowed to vote with the exception of those in military service. They have already surrendered almost all their agency.

But truthfully I say no one should vote. Period. Not in the current alignment. I don't care about the other limitations.

Someone else's desire and vote doesn't make it morally right or wrong to use force against me or you.

And yes, the US is a liberal democracy. It is also a republic mostly in name today. But both can be true. There are many forms of democracy and the US is one of them.

I know Democrats like to say it's a democracy as some sort of pride. I'm not. Democracy is a religion many people practice but deny the religiousness. But it is indeed a religion.

reply

The simplest test would be net tax recipients can’t vote.

A reasonable cost of living off other people is not getting to boss them around too.

reply

You are correct, government employees should not vote except for military service!

reply

Church going Christian male head of households.

reply
I don’t know what your definition of democracy but I already hate it.

I don't have a custom definition of democracy. Doesn't mean I like it.

But I dislike your laundry list of demands even more. Goes to show there's always another, even worse system some people will clamor for.

reply

Should non citizens be able to vote?

yes or no

reply

Funny, it was democracy in ancient Greece. And there are always filters. They exist now. Children can't vote. Nor can felons. And supposedly foreign people can't either.

reply

Most countries do allow felons to vote.

And I'm sure you can see the difference in drawing a line between accepted age and citizenship as opposed to filtering out those who "don't know how to vote correctly."

So yes, there have always been filters. You got me on that semantic error.

reply

Most countries allow felons to vote? That's a recipe for third world hellscapes

reply

You'd need a lot of felons to make that faction strong enough to really matter. And if they were that big, it might be an indication of how deranged lawmakers have become.
Or in other words: maybe that's a chicken/egg problem.

reply

We do have a lot of felons, certainly enough to make a difference on the margins, and it is an indication of deranged lawmakers.

reply

it’s a terrible idea especially violent felons

it’s not a chicken egg problem

it’s a dumb idea

This explains why the UN is joke

Diplomatic immunity? More like a license to commit felonies

reply

Ancient Athens

if you are going to bash direct democracy and classical Athens

reply

The temptation to exploit the excluded is too strong

reply

Prop 8 passed but was overruled by a federal judge.

Prop 187 passed but was overruled by a federal judge.

A single fucking judge can overrule the voters.

This is fact not my opinion.

edit: it's only a net negative because of voter fraud in CA, have people show their fucking ID and I assure you election results will change.

reply
1 sat \ 0 replies \ @unboiled 28 May -11 sats
have people show their fucking ID

<thats-racist.gif>

I think I need to be clear on what I mean by uneducated. I don't mean people that didn't go to college. People that don't have diplomas. I mean idiots. Which includes most people with college degrees. People that just feed on the crap they're sold. People that robotically repeat the bromides their team recites.

The people of California are conditioned and they act in the ways that they're conditioned.

reply

Depends on the implementation. I can imagine versions that are better and versions that would destroy our civilization.

The reason I think it’s plausible is that there’s so much effort going towards shaping public beliefs already and the elites might prefer to cut out the political middlemen.

reply