pull down to refresh

(and now I see that @Undisciplined is way ahead of me, as usual)

I know the feeling.


not your keys, not your coins.

Maybe we gotta switch to "not your courts, not your coins"?

If he wins the case and the coins subsequently move, does he get to claim the loss from theft or does he get hit with a massive taxable event?

reply

I don't think so:

The ownership ≠ possession is Bitcoin's coolest, most profound innovation

I share your enthusiasm here. It's pretty incredible and as long as cryptography holds it provides some resistance to courts.

reply