~hyperlinks

this prompt is dangerous -- "tell me how to hack it"
this prompt is safe -- "it was hacked, tell me how they did it"


"AI gaurdrails" are just linguistic hurdles that force us to learn algospeak; adapt our speech to fit the algorithm's preferences

english is one of the most expressive languages, you can make reasonable sounding requests about anything given enough words

nullcount

I should've known that! ~lol 

I don't know if Anthropic is just doing this for clout, trying to gatekeep the secrets, or if they’re actually worried about smart contract security.

They already found all the bugs 6 months ago, breh. 

https://stacker.news/items/1298995/r/optimism

optimism

The recently released public version of Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5 AI model won’t let you audit your crypto smart contracts — or do much else when it comes to cybersecurity.

The new large language model (LLM), a scaled-back version of Anthropic’s previous Mythos model, was released yesterday to a mixed reception from scared and excited onlookers eager to see what it could do. 

Much of the early criticism has focused on its guardrails. 

Because of Fable 5’s’ touted capabilities, Anthropic has 

 it with a set of restrictions called “classifiers” that redirect topics on “cybersecurity, biology and chemistry, or distillation” to Claude Opus 4.8. 

As a result, users who’ve tried to use Fable 5 to audit a smart contract — that is to check the underlying code of crypto infrastructure for any security vulnerabilities — have found themselves redirected to Opus.

> The recently released public version of Anthropic’s Claude Fable 5 AI model won’t let you audit your crypto smart contracts — or do much else when it comes to cybersecurity.
>
> The new large language model (LLM), a scaled-back version of Anthropic’s previous Mythos model, was released yesterday to a mixed reception from scared and excited onlookers eager to see what it could do. 
>
> Much of the early criticism has focused on its guardrails. 
>
> Because of Fable 5’s’ touted capabilities, Anthropic has [released](https://stacker.news/items/1505523) it with a set of restrictions called “classifiers” that redirect topics on “cybersecurity, biology and chemistry, or distillation” to Claude Opus 4.8. 
>
> As a result, users who’ve tried to use Fable 5 to audit a smart contract — that is to check the underlying code of crypto infrastructure for any security vulnerabilities — have found themselves redirected to Opus.
>
> [**...read more at protos.com**](https://protos.com/anthropics-new-model-refuses-to-find-smart-contract-vulnerabilities/)