pull down to refresh

232 sats \ 5 replies \ @k00b 19h \ on: Statement on the US government directive to suspend access to Fable5 and Mythos5 AI Politics_And_Law

That might explains why I just lost access to Fable in the middle of a chat.

It's funny because I was telling someone yesterday that Fable is sensitive to emotive conjugation. It blocked me when I asked it to "find bugs," but assisted when I asked it to "harden the code."

write
compose
106 sats \ 4 replies \ @k00b 19h

I might be growing a paranoid, but my first thought was that OpenAI is behind this.

reply
118 sats \ 0 replies \ @sox 12h

It's hard to flag this as paranoia when it's that obvious that OpenAI is behind this.

reply
197 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby OP 19h

Well, the obvious thing is that Anthropic didn't play ball with the US government earlier this year (#1443175, #1444092, #1444092, #1438014).

However, I feel like the Anthropic guy was constantly running around saying their models were so dangerous and so powerful that they were going to end the world. So, while I'm hopeful that there will be a wave of public sentiment against such bans as this, I won't be surprised if it doesn't materialize.

Seems like we may be on the way to some kind of nationalizing of the big AI companies.

reply
97 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby OP 19h

And now I can't pull up the announcement anymore:

reply
126 sats \ 0 replies \ @Scoresby OP 19h

if it is OpenAI, Anthropic looks like they are tattling on them:

reply