pull down to refresh

I'll have a look and report back.

Basically, there's super low activity in the last 3 years compared to their past contributions. I ended up tweaking and reached to the definition to mark Gavin Andresen as retired . he was showing up as active because of his 2022 comment saying he is retired.

At a high level, if someone had, say, 20 reviews before the last 3 years and only 1 in the recent period, they're labeled retired. less than 5 reviews makes them "fading."

I haven't accounted for work in btcpayserver or NBitcoin or Lightning yet, so I see that as a data limitation. However, I need to rethink the methodology , it's even marking 2026 contributors as retired.

1 sat \ 0 replies \ @Murch 19h

Yeah, I think Gavin left the space in 2016, he should definitely show up as retired

reply