pull down to refresh

nope, incorrect.

I appreciate your optimism, friend, but don't spew lies.

Who’s lying?

reply

ok, fine, "lying" requires intent... which I don't suspect you had. You're just incorrect in saying that their current purchases are "accretive in BTC terms." Sats/share is falling; they're dilution shareholders more than they're building the BTC hoard

reply

That’s better.

Does this calc consider the massive bitcoin stash they already have?

reply

Of course. That's immaterial for the current case

reply

Saylorboi Livingston disagrees!

According to his math this is accretive.

reply

Only so much I can stand that guy

reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @BlokchainB 12h

You aren’t the only one who finds him insufferable!

reply

liked him a while back then #1425743, #1414564. But AI-ing the book -- which I found otherwise quite good -- was on point for the slop he represents.

Everything that's wrong with AI and social media combined. (plus, being a Sailorboi twat -.-)