Yes, no doubt. Feel free to share and ask questions. There’s a lot of misinformation out there, so I wanted to raise this point: consider digging into Phoenix and other non-custodial wallet options.

If Binance shuts down tomorrow, you’d be exposed. Ever heard of Mt. Gox or FTX? Don’t rely solely on custodial services.

Make sense. Automated clanker?

Are you born ignorant or you became like that? How?

How do they use lightning? Do they run their how node and infrastructure?

is somehow "Lightning" not onchain. It sais in the title.

I agree, using multiple wallets for different purposes is the way. Much to learn still!

I agree, if the payment amount is near the channel size I want, Lightning is convenient because it directly creates inbound liquidity, kill two birds with one stone! As Darthcoin commented, if the amount is much larger than the channel size I want or have, then using on‑chain avoids tying up unexpectedly large capacity in a single channel.

Thanks for the detailed breakdown, this is really helpful for someone just starting with Phoenix and LN! Overall, your recommendation to start with a big LN deposit to get a solid initial channel makes a lot of sense for minimizing fees and maximizing usability, especially for new LN users. So I will go for that!

I'm not following. I already shared that info with someone who needs it. Why do I have to reinitialize the wallet? Isn't the main rule just to avoid reusing the same on-chain address? And about the Lightning QR: the node public key is visible, but does that actually matter if I open private channels?

here announced #1507175

more appropriate for the ~AGORA marketplace