pull down to refresh
Many truth pills in this video that Ill embrace for me.
- You leave your bloodline and reputation when you die.
- Fear is a weapon.
- They want you to be dependent by everything.
- Consider do a thing that could add a little of inconvenience while add freedom and independence in your life.
- Soy (I think spelled like this), stay away from bad things of this modern society that make us weak.
Much more there…
Just by one video I consider keep listening this guy words.
There's no better scalability solution than the LN. It works well, it's fast, and it empowers individuals by creating a network of pre-allocated value between them privately, allowing this to expand if a node is connected to other networks—it's beautiful how it works.
I see that this concern about Bitcoin working "off-grid" is shared by me and many others—maybe it's a silly concern or just a newbie thing, I don't know. I've seen all kinds of projects, from transactions via audio code, satellite, to Reticulum, but thinking about it, if the internet somehow stops working in the current state of human society, Bitcoin will be the least of our problems. In specific situations like power outages or state restrictions, projects like these really shine, and I'm very curious to see what they propose.
Is a multisig wallet a viable security option for an individual, or is it too much work and a single 12-word seed phrase plus a passphrase enough?
Can I setup many NWC to use it as a mini Uncle Jim for family and friends as I could use for different uses?
Why is LDK better than LND in this scenario? I saw a comparison, but is so much better?
But it's surprising that it got a BIP number
Since BIP-177 got one I think anything can too.
I don't understand BIP process so well, for me anything can receive a number and draw the `dev's attention if it is well written and has the minimum technical text for this analysis and debate by core team.
It's interesting they creating BIP like this to bring a discussion about a huge "IF", more I can learn about the deep abyss of knoledge that bitcoin is.
I don't believe this will be implemented anytime.
And who will be the target audience for your work—teams or spectators? I read your text and ended up not understanding it. Your rules are a good foundation for educational outreach; promoting the tool without a cult of personality should be the standard, but that's not what we see.
Some Bitcoiners argue that sports resembles bread and circuses, a distraction from more meaningful pursuits.
Even with that stigma, many individuals from different social and financial backgrounds enjoy and watch sports, and if approached the right way, it's another good medium for expanding knowledge. I hope you don't fall for betting; that's a trap.
This is what I heard from a dev I know who's an AI critic: Your excitement about AI is inversely proportional to your knowledge. And there have been a lot of people very excited about AI for a long time.
bitcoin is a buzzword for Spark trap those “bitcoiners” that claim for regulation and more bills, those who call bitcoin as “crypto”.