pull down to refresh
I know but I like bitcoin magazine and the vision they are trying to bring to the world. I know car and others are mad because of the shitcoin nonsense but overall I think they are a net positive in trying to spread the word about bitcoin and they employ and pay so many bitcoiners.
So I put my capital towards the world I want to see. Rather own NAKA and not the New York Times.
I know but I like bitcoin magazine and the vision they are trying to bring to the world.
oh man,
but on a serious note: how do you suppose you're doing that by buying/owning NAKA?
Mou
Buy owning shares on the public markets of course.
They sell shares I buy them
Ok, spell out the mechanics for me... How does your being a bagholder for NAKA et al help even those lofty, optimistic, hopeful ideas?
They sell shares I buy them. When I own shares and hold them I am part owner of the company and I using my capital to help them raise money to expand their business.
And IF they do well I have a call option on future profits.
If they don’t I lose my capital.
The thing about the free market is you can use your capital and short them if you don’t think they should exist.
Well, have fun staying poor. You're not helping Bitcoin, and you're not helping yourself
I will and will have a blast doing it!
you buy NAKA for hope and change
i buy NAKA to ape into leveraged bets on bitcoin
we are not the same
Ugh. I mean, why? You know you don't have to, right?