pull down to refresh

I know but I like bitcoin magazine and the vision they are trying to bring to the world. I know car and others are mad because of the shitcoin nonsense but overall I think they are a net positive in trying to spread the word about bitcoin and they employ and pay so many bitcoiners.

So I put my capital towards the world I want to see. Rather own NAKA and not the New York Times.

I know but I like bitcoin magazine and the vision they are trying to bring to the world.

oh man,

but on a serious note: how do you suppose you're doing that by buying/owning NAKA?

reply
reply

Buy owning shares on the public markets of course.

They sell shares I buy them

reply

Ok, spell out the mechanics for me... How does your being a bagholder for NAKA et al help even those lofty, optimistic, hopeful ideas?

reply

They sell shares I buy them. When I own shares and hold them I am part owner of the company and I using my capital to help them raise money to expand their business.

And IF they do well I have a call option on future profits.

If they don’t I lose my capital.

The thing about the free market is you can use your capital and short them if you don’t think they should exist.

reply

Well, have fun staying poor. You're not helping Bitcoin, and you're not helping yourself

reply

I will and will have a blast doing it!

reply

you buy NAKA for hope and change

i buy NAKA to ape into leveraged bets on bitcoin

we are not the same

~lol

reply

hahahah that’s the spirit!!

Why so serious??!?