pull down to refresh

depends on the type of institution but I think there is a lot of cope and hopium around this. wherever there is fiduciary responsibility, there is dramatic risk aversion. and it's not like that's a fiat invention, it exists for a good reason if you want to have any principal/agent risk in a complex financial system. what I do think is exciting, however, is multi-institutional multi-sig, which has no analogue in fiat and potentially gives those in that position the best of both worlds (or decent of both).

the more bullish answer is that wherever you don't have that risk to address, people will probably learn the hard way that they should indeed hold their own coins.

Thanks for the nuanced answer. It seems to me that self-custody is always going to be a long-shot for corporations.

But this still leaves the qualified custodians. I am surprised that there are so few (or perhaps I am just ignorant of how many there are). Do you worry about large pots of bitcoins piling up in the hands of a few custodians?

reply

I think coinbase getting hacked would be the single best thing that could happen for bitcoin.

reply

What would be the worst thing for Bitcoin?

reply
103 sats \ 1 reply \ @allenf OP 1 May

everybody (tries to) sell, price goes to (basically) zero, nobody mines, no blocks or all blocks are attacks, no nothing, it's over.

reply

or people just lost their seed...

reply