pull down to refresh

Is kind of a trick. I do not totally agree with this, but it can be used as additional way to shut the mouth of clueless policemen if they harass you.
You declare yourself a member of this virtual "micronation" https://www.republicamendalerenda.net/ so they cannot put you immediately under their jurisdiction.

I prefer to not be under any jurisdiction, just be myself.

Thank you

reply
101 sats \ 15 replies \ @Lux OP 4 May

AFAIU Brandon is trying to restore the Republic, abolish the scam of US INC, 14th amendment...
In law and legal matters there's protocols for just about anything, and not identifying yourself is not a good place to be.
Being the authority anyone can make their own nation, documents, identifications... just must be legally/lawfully sound, must know what they are doing.
A friend of mine has an ID that says LIVING MAN, but he also uses gov docs when he sees fit, kinda like with multiple passports, it depends on every single interaction/contract.
It's just that people in groups are stronger than individual men, by combining their efforts. That's why I think it's important what Brandon is doing, because the original Bill of Rights, DOI and Constitution made the God given freedom onto paper into Rights for members of the nation to enjoy.

reply
kinda like with multiple passports

Does he have many passports from governments or nations that he created?

reply

No, would be fraud

reply

Own those IDs is not like consent all those nations?

reply

I think I misunderstood your previous q.

No need for 'many'

He can adapt to situations, it's called response ability.

reply
22 sats \ 4 replies \ @Fenix 6 May

but is he applying in all those jurisdictions when he uses his corporation name to get all passport.

That is something that Darth talked to me but Im too far from the application of that lesson yet, about use the system, the all caps name in jurisdiction level, dead corpse with dead corpse. Brandon speak a similar thing on his website faq:

Q: Will I lose my Social Security or any benefits by doing this?
A: No you will not. You are going to be separating yourself from your sole proprietorship in law: one will be you as the white man/woman who is a citizen of State (which is the original category for a real American) and the sole prop of your name in all caps will be the US citizen. All your “benefits” are attached to the sole proprietorship. That organization is not going ANYWHERE. Look on a W-9 form… it describes you as the “owner” of the sole proprietorship/”disregarded entity.” The sole prop is described as a “business” or “entity” and it describes you as its “owner.” It’s all been right in front of our faces.
reply
122 sats \ 1 reply \ @DarthCoin 6 May

Yes, is true, that "corporation" it never go away. You have 2 options:

  • take control of it, with UCC-1 and live with it, using it only when you consider necessary
  • take control of it (so they cannot use it anymore against you) but go full batshit crazy sovereign, living isolated on an island alone.

If you live in a so called "society", is almost impossible to avoid using that corporation (your caps name). We are not there yet, when the majority of the people understand these things. So in order to go with your regular life, sometimes you are forced to use it. But use it wisely. Avoid as much as you can to use it, because is a trap in the end. If you use only in your defense, then you can escape of that trap.

Anyways, you are on the right track, bringing these subjects to discussion. Few people dare to do it.

it depends on every single interaction/contract.

totally agree with that. Is not all black and white, you have to take advantage of each situation and use whatever is suitable for that "incident".

Important is that you are always in defense, not on offensive (like those sovereign citizens are doing). You use your own tools, only when is needed.

Brandon is trying to restore the Republic,

few people understand what he's trying to do. It sounds complicated for many, but is not wrong.

reply
22 sats \ 4 replies \ @Lux OP 4 May
Important is that you are always in defense

Exactly. If you think something is unjust, unfair.. there's always remedy

reply

I saw many stupid people yelling to a cop "I am a sovereign citizen, you cannot touch me"... but they have no idea what to say after that or they start saying only bullshit crap.

That's why so many normies immediately after somebody start talking about these kind of things, wrongfully consider you a "sovereign citizen" (as in the raw footage you posted, cops talking each other like "ah is the sovereign citizen case", but in fact they have no clue about what it can come over their head). Brandon is right saying that this case is a "treasure", the guy can sue them and win a lot of money. But yeah, that will not be anymore in defense...

I have another approach with cops: I just ask pertinent questions that they do not have a clear answer, until they let me go. Calmly and politely.

reply
55 sats \ 0 replies \ @Fenix 5 May

After coming to understand how interactions between public agents and citizens work, always looking for consent, I started seeing encounter videos for what they really are. The citizen just hands over everything that wasn't even asked for, putting themselves in a submissive position—it's automatic. I haven't had that unpleasant experience yet; if I do, I'm still not a sovereign individual in possession of my public titles to use if necessary, but I know I shouldn't give them even a shred of consent and should ask pertinent questions. The questions for a basic encounter provided by the Sovereign Project are a very good framework that opens our minds to what they actually want when they approach us.

reply
the guy can sue them and win a lot of money

yes, but it can be a defense tactic also, just mention all that in court and they seek a deal or leave you alone

reply

The basic understanding is that I am a living, sovereign man, right? This sovereign individual doesn't consent to the jurisdiction of corporations; he uses their own tools to deal with them within their jurisdictions—that's not a form of consent, is it?

reply